The Green Files > RealClimate

[RealClimate] In addition, the AAAS, in partnership with NSF, has a web site on communicating science (www.aaas.org/communicatingscience). They have sections on the basics of communication, working with reporters, and public outreach.

Previous [Previous] Google searching not eco-friendly? - broadstuff...

Next [Next] A surprising idea for “solving” climate chan...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[Change.org's Stop Global Warming Blog] Stop Global Warming - Change.org: Doubling America's Renewable ...: CONNECTION TO PLASCO Energy Group: NONE, except for an inquiry that we made from a website while researching alternative renewable resource technologies.  We first read about the “Plasma gasification”

[CJR] Everything You Wanted to Know About Climate Change : CJR: Described by Scientific American as “a focused, objective blog written by scientists for a brainy community that likes its climate commentary served hot.”

[Climate Progress] Climate Progress » Blog Archive » Obama’s strongest message on ...: Holdren at the Belfer Center, I’m not worried that he will be too focused on the science and not enough on the technical solutions or the links to business. He has a firm grasp of the innovation cycle, understands the public goods inherent in R&D (and how difficult they can be to tap), and doesn’t underestimate the scope of the revolution required.

RealClimate: While at the conference, I had a rare chance to see some of the inner workings of one of the world's largest and most successful environmental organizations (this was an invite-only conference, and only a handful of us were other than Nature Conservancy staff and trustees). The Nature Conservancy has a reputation of being very non-partisan, and this was abundantly evident at the conference: There were representatives present from the Shell Oil Company, from the Christian Coalition, from Environmental Defense.

[Watts Up With That?] A Test of Climate, Sun, and Culture Relationships from an 1810 ...: If they could just remove those AGW blinders and really look at the science of what may be impacting the monsoons, I suspect they will find that it is not greenhouse gases that are at play here, but rather high levels of atmospheric particulate matter that is impacting the timing and intensity of the monsoons, particulate matter that is being emitted by the increasingly vibrant economies of India and China. It’s not the CO2 they should be worrying about, but rather all the real pollution that is being emitted that impacts directly on the health of nearby residents and indirectly impacts the well-being of all the regional residents through changes in the monsoonal pattern.

[Climate 411 - Environmental Defense Fund] Climate 411 » Did Global Warming Stop in January? - Blogs ...: It appears the above is just another attempt to obfuscate the data, which show that the temp rise has stopped over the last few years (even though CO2 is rising) and we are facing a downtrend in temp, with more variation etc which was normal at previous times in our history when Man was insignificant. If the environmentalists can hang on for another 10 years or so, things will be much more clear.

[newmatilda.com - Independent news, analysis and satire] Death Rattles of the Climate Change Skeptics | newmatilda.com: It should also be recognised that the Greenhouse Effect which is taken as read by climatologists, is NOT basic climate science but belongs in the realm of quantum theory of radiation and absorption by gases and associated, quite difficult, spectroscopic measurements, molecular collision theory, spectral line broadening, kinetic theory of gases, thermo dynamics, and many other branches of physics and physical chemistry of which most meteorologists/climatologists would have only a vague appreciation. The suggestion, therefore, that scientists ‘who are not "climatologists"

[The Air Vent] Ten Global Warming Myths « The Air Vent: Several conclude warmer temps than today in recent history Your point about it not being an important piece of the AGW case is confusing, Real Climate references have little meaning on this blog you should be very careful when reading there. In the opinion of the Air Vent, they are a political front for bad science such as Mann08 and GISS temperature data.

[neo-neocon] neo-neocon » Blog Archive » I get it now: those Wall Street whiz ...: I’m not qualified to judge the validity of models, but I understand the folks over at RealClimate are experts at hashing out the arguments - you can check there. I do know that people who say that some particular piece of data has been overlooked and thereby invalidates all global warming research are wrong - they’re the same sort of people who think they’ve disproved evolution or that HIV causes AIDS.

[NC Media Watch] NC Media Watch: Sac Bee launches new climate change reporting project: I have been tracking Sierra temperatures in the research literature and local records for several years now, and will be commenting on the Bee's claims in the coming weeks. The Bee is only looking at that last 50 years, and it is important to take longer look at climate change in the Sierra to see if the last 50 years is unusual, or just part of larger natural cycles.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, ,