[Previous] Commonwealth supports climate change fund | Electric.c...

 [Next] Cute Endangered Animals: Global Warming Edition | Mother ...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[Laissez-Nous Faire] The Inquisition of Global Warming ”” By Debra Saunders | Laissez ...: In a leaked e-mail, CRU Director Phil Jones complained of a 2003 peer-reviewed article that departed from global warming orthodoxy. Jones went so far as to boast, “I will be e-mailing the journal (Climate Research) to tell them I’m having nothing to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor,”

[PR Pond Newswire - US:CA: Placerville & Greater El Dorado County] Deb Saunders: The inquisition of global warming | PR Pond Newswire: This just in from the Times of London: After the leak of highly embarrassing e-mail messages from the University of East Anglia's influential Climatic Research Unit, CRU has been forced to admit that it dumped "the original raw" climate data used to bolster the case for human-caused global warming, while retaining only the "value-added" - read: massaged - data.

[CEJournal] Monbiot: environmentalists in denial over CRU emails | CEJournal: “[T]he problem [of disciplinary isolation such as MBH evinced] applied more generally, to the broader climate-change and meteorological community, which also relied on statistical techniques in their studies. “[I]f statistical methods are being used, then statisticians ought to be funded partners engaged in the research to insure as best we possibly can that the best quality science is being done,”

[Watts Up With That?] Uh, oh - raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the ...: It’s easy to see what the warmist tactic is in reply to climategate.Point out that whatever is in those e-mails does not affect the bigger picture.Science is still saying sea level rise blah blah blah.The interviewer in that fox video posted here gave that warmist a platform to spout that the science is still certain on global warming,what he said will stay in the mind,because the interviewer didn’t cut him off,and didn’t ask what data the settled science is using,and has that data been corrupted?There is so much information out there,but it is spread all over the web.All I’m seeing is one scientist went too far,but he will be sacked or resign,then we can go back to all the other data that is showing global warming as a threat.It is why they are calling for Phil to resign.All the msm is doing is giving a platform to warmists to state the view that global warming is a threat under the guise of investigating climategate.

[911.olotila.net] The Inquisition of Global Warming @ 911.olotila.net: In a leaked e-mail, CRU Director Phil Jones complained of a 2003 peer-reviewed article that departed from global warming orthodoxy. Jones went so far as to boast, “I will be e-mailing the journal (Climate Research) to tell them I’m having nothing to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor,”

[JoNova] The Global Gravy Train Takes A Major Political Hit « JoNova: Caesar is dead!(maybe global warming brought the `Ides of march early,Mr turnbull,eh?) Hope springs eternal!..Although we should not forget the protagonists of the great global warming swindle almost have the world in their grasp and the krudd kronies have no choice but to go into `scare em stupid` overdrive as this might well be labores nemesis Ala `work choices`. A unlimitted scope `AGW` royal commission with wholly transparent published results could well be the order of the day as this would expose the CO2N and lead to the annihilation of labor in 2010.

[The Jawa Report] The Jawa Report: Everything You've Always Suspected About the ...: Update:Watts Up With That? looks at the "hide the decline" email and discovers incriminating evidence hidden in the programmer source code: .

[News] Climategate: Science Museum's green propaganda backfires ...: When the total out votes on the Museum website (see Ric Werme’s website) were 8241 (3 more than the 8238 reported as the final total ”˜out’ score) at 22:00 UTC on 29 November, the total ”˜in’ vote reported on the website was 5464 about 600 less than the 6058 of the final in score. When the website ”˜out’ vote was 7610 (2 less than the 7612 final website ”˜out’ score) at 16.00 on 24 November, the website ”˜in’ vote was 5210, almost twice the final reported website ”˜in’ vote.

[Pajamas Media] Pajamas Media » Three Things You Absolutely Must Know About ...: “As many of you will be aware, a large number of emails from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia webmail server were hacked recently (Despite some confusion generated by Anthony Watts, this has absolutely nothing to do with the Hadley Centre which is a completely separate institution). As people are also no doubt aware the breaking into of computers and releasing private information is illegal, and regardless of how they were obtained, posting private correspondence without permission is unethical.”

[Cafe Hayek] Not science: You need to be able to reproduce work in science, and knowing what was kept or thrown out when plugged into regressions is part of doing so. As "The Reticulator" said in his reply to your comment below , this is important information as there are likely many sources of data which the NOAA has and we don't know which ones were or weren't used, if the data is indeed simply a copy of some subset of NOAA data.

[Crowhill Weblog] End of the road for climate science? | Crowhill Weblog: Tucked away on its website is this statement: “Data storage availability in the 1980s meant that we were not able to keep the multiple sources for some sites … We, therefore, do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (i.e., quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

[Andrew Bolt] A scandal too big for these words | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog: The Climate Inquisition The Great Climate Purge The Great Waterfont Property rip-off. The Climate Reformation CO2gate.

[The American Spectator and AmSpecBlog] The American Spectator : Global Warmists Caught Red-Handed: Last week hackers -- I think of them as selfless public-spirited hackers -- broke into the electronic files of one of the leading Global Warmist research centers, the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in the UK, and posted some 3,000 of the Warmists' conspiratorial emails for all the world to see. To my ineffable gratification, the emails displayed the Global Warmists sedulously engaging in just what you would expect in the Kultursmog

[Guy Fawkes' blog] Time to Defund CRU's Global Cooling Deniers - Guy Fawkes' blog: What is clear is that the proponents of the man-made global warming hypothesis have not sought to test their theories in the normal scientific way, they have sought to first of all marginalise and defund researchers who put forward a different view.  They have hidden information, faked up data, used in their own words trickery, in an effort to hide the decline in global temperatures which is one of the inconvenient facts contradicting the predictions derived from their theories. 

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Global Warming, The Green Files