[Previous] Protecting environment must involve morals, Archbishop Chap...

 [Next] Greenpeace - Making Waves: Greenpeace admits: BBC got it wrong...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[Greenpeace UK blogs] Breaking news - another nuclear consultation was fixed | Greenpeace UK: We then filed a complaint with the Market Research Standards Board based on our analysis of the polling questions asked to members of the public and the materials they were shown. Positive messages about nuclear power were made as statements of fact ('Nuclear power stations could make an important contribution to reducing the UK's CO2 emissions') while negative issues for nuclear power required answers by degree, with the loaded term 'satisfied' included in the question ('How satisfied are you with the Government's proposal to manage new nuclear waste in the same way as existing waste?')

[Greenpeace New Zealand Weblog] To GE or not to GE? | Greenpeace New Zealand Weblog: New Zealnd Food Safety Authority and Food Standards Australia New Zealand seem to follow the above unamed scientists view that dose denotes risk. That is a convenient way forward to facilitate trade and to allow the petro-chemical industry more ways to exploit farmers and consumers, but fails to put in serious research into the myriad combinations that synthetic chemicals are consumed in and their effects in those combinations.

[Editorial] The Patriot Ledger on Romney, Kennedy and politics: Might I also suggest that you adjust your aim toward the adults of Greenpeace, for their misrepresentation. Neil took photos of the electrical "cord to nowhere" that I saw first hand, and that Greenpeace found impossible to explain away as the wind tower they presented as powering the project was not connected to anything at the Barnstable County Fair.

[REDD-Monitor] Global Canopy Programme misled conservation activists before vote ...: Mitchell claimed on behalf of the Global Canopy Programme that “A growing body of NGO’s, leading expert scientists and now also MEPs, support the view that the EU ETS should be open to including forests in the market and that methodological barriers and flooding arguments which are used to uphold the current EU ban are likely to be overcome prior to acceptance of REDD under the UN’s Kyoto Mechanism…For your information, I am attaching a new briefing document from WWF which is broadly in support of the measures we have been calling for during the past year and is further evidence of the growing support for including forests within the EU Trading scheme“. In fact, WWF have specifically stated that they are opposed to the inclusion of forests in the ETS, and immediately demanded that Mitchell issue a retraction.

[EcoStreet] UK's nuclear consultation sham at EcoStreet - A walk down ...: The UK Government's consultation on the Future of Nuclear Power - forced on to it by a successful legal action brought by Greenpeace - ended on Wednesday 10th October. By coincidence, Wednesday was also the 50th anniversary of Britain's worst nuclear .

[Dot Earth] An Accidental Beneficiary of Warfare: Wildlife - Dot Earth Blog ...: In fact, war in the Congo has directly resulted in crisis level food insecurity (= increased demand for meat from killing forest animals including bonobos), countless numbers of displaced people who pose added burdens on demand for food, rife levels of corruption and mismanagement, immeasurable but vast numbers of weapons and munitions distributed across the country, large-scale break down of traditional taboos that may have locally protected some populations of bonobos, and much, much more. In no way —

[Jennifer Marohasy] Jennifer Marohasy: Serious Trouble Ahead for Whaling and Sealing ...: The next most probable outcome, after instant death, from an explosive charge in the vicinity of the brain, is unconsciousness. Remaining conscious for even part of that time, let alone right up to the point of death, would be a very distant third.

[Daniel Hannan's blog listings.] We are governed by a gaggle of pantywaists - Telegraph Blogs: I can’t believe it…Dan Hannan, the blogger who never ever replies to his posters pops up among the posters he ignores with a little self advert..crying,’WATCH ME…WATCH ME’..what a self publiscist the man is becoming. I thought the constant stream of self advertising photos during the campaign were tiresome but this little episode really takes the biscuit.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Greenpeace, The Green Files