[Previous] James Hansen compares “global warming” to...

 [Next] Olympics impacts report: Environment, bad; business, good; hou...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[LYNN SAMUELS] LYNN SAMUELS:: A new study by the influential American Scientist, hardly a right-wing global warming sceptic group, indicates that the Kilimanjaro glaciers are not being affected by global warming. Yet the melting of this glacier is frequently sited by Al Gore and other eco-worshipers as proof of global warming.

[Pat Dollard | Young Americans] Pat Dollard | Young Americans | Blog Archive » Leading British ...: But Professor Plimer, of Adelaide and Melbourne Universities, said that to stop climate change Governments should find ways to prevent changes to the Earth’s orbit and ocean currents and avoid explosions of supernovae in space. Of the saga of the leaked emails, he said: “If you have to argue your science by using fraud, your science is not valid.”

[Tribune-Review News] PSU professor feels fallout of e-mails - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: Critics last month began attacking Mann for e-mails he received and wrote during at least a 10-year period with Phil Jones, former director of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England. Penn State officials began an inquiry into the allegations, said Lisa Powers, a school spokeswoman, but she would not say whether university officials are investigating the integrity of Mann's research.

[New Cool Thang] New Cool Thang » Global Warming TEDTalks 2: I think it is unrealistic to believe that the recent Climategate stuff will invalidate all of the global warming research for the last fifty years. There are multitudinous points to debate in the argument about what is happening in the climate, what is causing it, and what we should do about it, but referring to all the climate scientists as “scientists”

[Frugal Café Blog Zone] Shaky House of Cards”¦ Australia Parliament Has Voted “NO” on ...: Many in Australia have been skeptical and suspicious about the wild claims of the junk science community. Next week, when more is revealed about the global warming deception and fraud uncovered at Penn State and CRU, Australians in leadership may be grinning from ear to ear for being the first to demonstrate common sense in the face of this international scam on CO2 emissions.

[DailyFinance] China's $9 trillion global warming problem -- DailyFinance: But the report may not have accounted for mitigating factors resulting from global warming, often cited by global warming skeptics, that could actually reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. One example: longer growing seasons and milder winters in the Northern Hemisphere could help plants absorb more carbon, and the types of plants that thrive could likewise suck up more carbon than their cold-loving predecessors.

[Blogger News Network] » Honest Skepticism on Global Warming - Blogger News Network: In regular arguments over the last decade or so with college chums, men and women of good will and intelligence who were convinced that AGW was real and a huge problem, they have regularly pointed to the science and the positions of the leading climatologists. I applied some discount to these evidences because of their source - climatologists are a lot more likely to get funding for detecting huge threats than they are for studying how clouds make pretty patterns, so they have a natural bias towards wanting to find something - but, though skeptics make a brave case of the dissenters, there were just so many climate people saying “oh my, it’s such a problem”

[small dead animals] small dead animals: Rex Murphy ~ Climate Change: Science or Politics?: People make various claims, but the fact of the matter is, people in the science generally cannot routinely predict what will happen two weeks, a month, or a season ahead. Some people are better than others at it, but nobody is so routinely good at it that we could turn to them and ask for their infallible opinion about what long-term trends will be.

[Bad Astronomy] The global warming emails non-event | Bad Astronomy | Discover ...: * Climatologists generally have a “jurisdictional blindness” issue and are too willing overlook geological and astronomical factors such as significant volcanic eruptions, meteor impacts,cosmic rays, Solar sunspot cycles (eg. the Maunder minimum caused the “little Ice Age”) and solar variations, Milankovitch orbital cycles, the role of the Sun’s Galactic orbit and neighbourhoods, eg.

[Pajamas Media] Pajamas Media » Three Things You Absolutely Must Know About ...: Murrary’s blog carefully. If those purported scientists were so sure of their speculation being correct, why did they conspire to suppress dissenting voices, why did they conspire to hide data, and why did they conspire to fudge the numbers?

[Political Punch] White House Pushes Back on Climate Change Email Controversy ...: My goodness, any rational human being could see the clues world-wide pointing to our big problem of climate change. Glaciers melting to record levels, first frost dates moving further and further back, (I'm a gardener and in our area the first frost date was always on or before September 25th, for the last twenty years it is a few days later each year, this year it was November 5th.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Global Warming, The Green Files